Skip to content

Demo

Five interactive views of what WildMatch does, each on its own page. They follow the paper's argument: first the direct before/after comparison, then an honest look at where fine-tuning helps and where it does not, then the weak supervision the method learns from, the background-masking step every image passes through, and finally a playground on synthetic renders. Use the arrows at the bottom of each page to walk through them in order.

How to read the demos

  • Score is the matcher's image score: the summed confidence of the mutual-nearest matches above the threshold, divided by the smaller keypoint count, as in the paper.
  • Lines are correspondences between the two photos. Their weight follows confidence, hovering one shows its exact value, and a slider sets how many of the strongest are drawn.
  • Masks: matches are computed on background-removed inputs, the inputs the paper uses, and drawn on the original photos.
  • Frames: blue marks the true individual, red marks a hard negative or a SAM 3 mask outline; each page explains its own colours.

Photographs from CzechLynx (Picek et al.), WildlifeReID-10k and SalamanderID2025 (AnimalCLEF 2025), the latter shown with the dataset team's permission. Synthetic lynx renders from the CzechLynx synthetic subset, Zenodo record 17592004, CC BY 4.0.